THE SECOND LETTER
1. Who wrote the Second Letter to the Thessalonians?
1.1. Whom does 2 Thess 1:1 identify as the authors of 2 Thessalonians?
2 Thess 1:1 identifies Paul, Silvanus (Silas) and Timothy as the authors of the 2 Thessalonians.
1.2. As in 1 Thessalonians, the use of the first person plural (verb forms and pronouns) occurs frequently in 2 Thessalonians, signifying that it is a joint composition of Paul, Silvanus (Silas) and Timothy (2 Thess 1:3, 4, 11, 2:1, 13, 15; 3:1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 11, 12). Nevertheless, the first person singular occurs in 2 Thess 2:5: "Do you not remember that I told you this when I was with you?" This indicates that Paul, the first named of the three authors, is the principal author. This is confirmed by the fact that, in the conclusion of the letter, Paul writes, "The greeting is in my own hand, Paul. This is a sign of authenticity of all my letters; this is how I write" (3:17). It was Paul's practice to write his own greeting, which naturally assumes that an amanuensis wrote everything else up to that point (see also 1 Cor 16:21; Gal 6:11; Col 4:18). The difference in handwriting would be obvious to the readers. (Paul may have sought to authenticate his letter in this way because of spurious letters circulating in his name [2:2].) The implication of 2 Thess 3:17 is that Paul was the principal author of the letter, which means that Silvanus (Silas) and Timothy had ancillary roles in its composition. Who the amanuensis of the letter was is not specified, but it is possible that it was Silvanus (Silas) or Timothy. (At a later time, Silvanus [Silas] was the amanuensis of Peter [1 Pet 5:12].)
1.3. Some have questioned the Pauline authorship of 2 Thessalonians on several grounds. The more significant reasons for questioning the authenticity of the letter are as follows.
1.3.1. The eschatology of 2 Thessalonians (2 Thess 2:1-12) is alleged to be so different from that of 1 Thessalonians (4:13-5:11) that both letters could not have been written by the same person. In 2 Thess 2:3 before the parousia of Christ there must appear the man of lawlessness, whereas in 1 Thess 4:16-17; 5:1-3 the Lord will appear suddenly, "like a thief in the night," with no intervening events. The eschatology of 1 Thessalonians is said to resemble that found in 1 Corinthians (15), an authentic letter, and so 2 Thessalonians is judged to be inauthentic. Do you find this reason questioning the authenticity of 2 Thessalonians convincing? How would you explain the apparently dissimilar eschatologies on the assumption of Pauline authorship?
1 & 2 Thessalonians do not necessarily have contradictory eschatologies. In 2 Thessalonians, Paul is addressing the problem of a report allegedly originating with him that the day of the Lord has already come. In response, he explains that it could not have come, since the man of lawlessness has not yet appeared (2 Thess 2:2). In 1 Thessalonians the purpose of Paul's teaching about the parousia is to provide comfort for those whose loved ones have died. In this context, he explains that the Day of Lord will come unexpectedly. It is possible to harmonize both eschatological statements on the assumption that in neither letter does Paul give a complete account of the eschaton: the parousia will come like a thief in the night, not because it comes without warning, but because people do not heed the warning. The penultimate event is the appearance of the man of lawlessness, whom most people will not identify as such. Paul makes it clear that he has already explained this teaching to his readers when present in Thessalonica (2 Thess 2:5), so that he does not have to repeat everything that he taught them, but only what they needed to hear at that time.
1.3.2. 2 Thessalonians is so similar in structure to 1 Thessalonians and has so many verbal parallels that some argue that 2 Thessalonians was written by an imitator, using 1 Thessalonians as a model.
A. Structurally, the main bodies of the two letters are similar; much of the content of 2 Thessalonians is paralleled in 1 Thessalonians. (Unparalleled material is found in 2 Thes 1:5-12; 2:15; 3:1-4, 13-14, 17.)
1. 2 Thess 2:13 (14) = 1 Thess 2:13. In both letters, a second thanksgiving occurs in the main body.
2. 2 Thess 2:1-12 = 1 Thess 4:13-5:11. The topic of the parousia of the Lord (Jesus Christ) is dealt with at length in both letters.
3. 2 Thess 2:16-17; 3:5; 3:16 = 1 Thess 5:23. Three times in 2 Thessalonians and once in 1 Thessalonians, a prayer is offered introduced by "The Lord (or God) (himself)" and in which the optative mood of the verb is used.
4. 2 Thess 3:6-15 = 1 Thess 5:12-15. The problem of idleness is addressed in each letter.
B. There are many verbal parallels between 1 and 2 Thessalonians.
1. The salutation of 1 Thessalonians and 2 Thessalonians are more similar to each than either is to any of Paul’s other salutations (1 Thes 1:1: "Paul, Silvanus and Timothy, to the church of the Thessalonians in God the father and the Lord Jesus Christ. Grace to you and peace / 2 Thess 1:1-2: "Paul, Silvanus and Timothy, to the church of the Thessalonians in God the father and the Lord Jesus Christ. Grace to you and peace from God the father and the Lord Jesus Christ").
2. There are several phrases common to both letters: (1) “work of faith” (1 Thess 1:3; 2 Thess 1:11); (2) “faith…love…endurance” (1 Thess 1:3; 2 Thess 1:3-4); (3) “who do not know God” (1 Thess 4:5; 2 Thess 1:8); (4) “finally” (to) loipon) (1 Thess 4:1; 2 Thess 3:1); (5) “brothers loved by…” (1 Thess 1:4; 2 Thess 2:13); (6) “hard work and toil, worked, day and night, in order not to be a burden to any of you” (1 Thess 2:9; 2 Thess 3:8); (7) "love / abound" (1 Thess 3:12; 2 Thess 1:3); (8) "pray for us" (1 Thess 5:25; 2 Thess 3:1; (9) "the parousia of our Lord Jesus (Christ)" (1 Thess 3:13; 2 Thess 2:1); (10) "we appeal in the Lord Jesus (Christ) (1 Thess 4:1; Thess 3:12); (11) "establish you" (1 Thess 3:2; 2 Thess 3:3); (12) "receive from us" (1 Thess 2:13; 4:1; 2 Thess 3:6).
3. There are also many examples
of single words appearing in both 1 Thessalonians and 2 Thessalonians;
obviously, the less common of these words are the more significant for
the purpose of establishing a literary or some other relationship between
them. Two of the common words ("to make straight" [kateuthunô];
"idle / idly" [ataktos / ataktôs]) occur
only in these two letters in the Pauline corpus.
Do you find the argument to be convincing that 2 Thessalonians is so similar in structure to the 1 Thessalonians and has so many verbal parallels that 2 Thessalonians must have been written by an imitator, using 1 Thessalonians as a model?
It is a circular argument to say that too much similarity in structure and too many verbal parallels mean that an imitator is at work. It could just as easily be argued that these data are explained on the assumption that the same author is writing to the same group of people around the same time and dealing with the same concerns. Usually, it is argued that texts that are literarily too dissimilar cannot be from the same author. It is also possible that Paul, Silvanus and Timothy used a copy of 1 Thessalonians when composing 2 Thessalonians.
1.3.3. The tone of 1 Thessalonians is said to be so different from that of 2 Thessalonians that the same author could not have written both letters; it is supposed that a writer could not change his attitude towards his readers so drastically. In 1 Thess 1:2, Paul, Silvanus and Timothy thank God for the Thessalonians and again in 1 Thess 2:13 (see 3:9). The readers are commended for their "faith and love" (3:6). By contrast, in 2 Thessalonians the authors say "we ought to thank God always" for the readers (1:3; 2:13), implying that they cannot at present do so because latter have fallen short of a standard in some way, unlike the intended readers of 1 Thessalonians. Moreover, in 2 Thess 3:6, 12, Paul, Silvanus and Timothy give commands to the Thessalonians, which stands in contrast to the more conciliatory tone of 1 Thessalonians Do you find the argument that the tone of the two letters is so different that they must have different authors to be compelling?
It is questionable whether 1 & 2 Thessalonians are so significantly different in tone that it is possible to conclude that they do not have the same authorship. To interpret the phrase "we ought always to thank God" as implying some serious reservations about the worthiness of the objects of the thanksgiving is wrong, since the two thanksgivings in 2 Thessalonians do not even hint at any criticism of the Thessalonians (1:3-4; 2:12-14). Rather the phrase "we ought always to thank God" seems to be a variation of "we thank God always (or continually) (1 Thess 1:2; 2:13). It is true that Paul, Silvanus and Timothy are relieved to hear of the Thessalonians' perseverance and express this exuberantly, but there is a equivalent positive tone to 2 Thessalonians, though more subdued perhaps. The fact that the authors give commands in 2 Thessalonians is explained by the fact of a recent negative development in the church, the idleness of some of its members. To assume that an author or authors must always adopt the same tone when writing is unreasonable, given the possibility of a change of relationship to the readers.
1.3.4. The greeting supposedly written by the hand of Paul in 2 Thess 3:17 is interpreted by some as a transparent attempt by the real author to pass himself as Paul. On this hypothesis, the real Paul would not have had recourse to such an obvious means of epistolary authentication. (If true, then "pseudo-Paul" is also responsible for the spurious self-reference in 2 Thess 2:2 "some letter supposedly from us.")
Do you find the argument that the real author forged a greeting from Paul in order to give the semblance of authenticity to his composition?
Since Paul was in the habit of writing a greeting in his own hand in his letters, it is pure supposition to claim that a forger is responsible for the greeting in 2 Thessalonians (see 1 Cor 16:21; Gal 6:11; Col 4:18).
1.3.5. It should also be noted that if the author of 2 Thessalonians is not Paul, then in 2 Thess 2:1-2 the spurious author audaciously condemns others for creating letters falsely alleged to have come from Paul and his associates: "I ask you...not to be alarmed...at some letter supposedly from us." To write this would be so hypocritical as to be unbelievable.
2.1. Whom does 2 Thess 1:1 identify as the intended readers of 2 Thessalonians?
2 Thess 1:1 identifies tThe intended readers of 2 Thessalonians as the members of "the church of the Thessalonians."
2.2. While in Thessalonica, Paul, Silvanus (Silas) and Timothy transmitted a body of oral teaching to the Thessalonians, to which they later appeal in their two letters (1 Thess 3:4; 4:2; 2 Thess 2:5, 15; 3:10). This oral teaching included the necessity of suffering persecution (1 Thess 3:4), information about eschatological matters (2 Thess 2:5) and the necessity of work: "If anyone is not willing to work, he shall not eat" (2 Thess 3:10).
2 Thessalonians is usually dated to shortly after the composition of 1 Thessalonians, c. 50-52. Attempts have been made to establish the reverse, that 2 Thessalonians was written first, but the evidence for such a position is weak. The data supporting the traditional relative dating is as follows.
3.1. Paul makes reference to at least one previous letter in 2 Thess 2:15, which is probably a reference to 1 Thessalonians. By contrast, Paul says nothing in 1 Thessalonians of having written a previous letter.
3.2. In 1 Thess 2:2-10 Paul, Silvanus (Silas) and Timothy give thanks to God for the conversion of the Thessalonians, how they "turned to God from idols to worship the living and true God." Likewise, in the second thanksgiving it is said: "We thank God continually because when you received the word of God, heard from us, you received it not as the word of man but, as it really is, the word of God" (2:13). On the other hand, in 2 Thess 1:3-4, the authors give thanks for the continued growth of the Thessalonian believers: "We ought always to give thanks for you...because your faith is increasing and the love that you have for another abounds." What does this suggest about the order in which the two letters were written?
It suggests that 1 Thessalonians was written first and, after a period of time, 2 Thessalonians was written. The authors are first thankful for the conversion of the Thessalonians and later then thankful for their continued spiritual growth.
3.3. 1 Thessalonians was written upon Timothy's return to Paul in Corinth (1 Thess 3:6). Prior to Timothy's being sent from Athens to Thessalonica and his return to Paul, the authors knew nothing of the spiritual condition of their Thessalonian converts, and so were greatly anxious for them (1 Thess 2:17-3:10). If 2 Thessalonians was written before 1 Thessalonians, it is strange that there is no hint of this anxiety for the Thessalonians in that letter, nor any statement of a desire to return to the city to check on their condition (see 1 Thess 2:17-3:1). The impression with which the reader is left is that 2 Thessalonians was written after 1 Thessalonians. Besides, 2 Thessalonians presupposes knowledge of the Thessalonians' spiritual condition that the authors did not have until after Timothy's return from his return visit to the city at the earliest (see 3:11).
Assuming that 2 Thessalonians was written shortly after 1 Thessalonians, from what you know of Pauline chronology, where do you think that Paul wrote 2 Thessalonians?
Paul wrote 2 Thessalonians in Corinth, where he was when he wrote 1 Thessalonians.
Outline of the Second Letter to the Thessalonians
This represents the introduction of the letter.
This represents the salutation of the letter.
In 1:3-4, Paul gives thanks to God for the Thessalonians. Deviating from standard epistolary form, in 1:5-10 Paul speaks about the judgment of God at the revealing of the Lord Jesus, when God will repay those who are persecuting the Thessalonians. He then offers a prayer for the Thessalonians in 1:11-12.
This represents the main body of the letter.
Paul explains in more detail about the parousia of Christ, because there is a rumor that the day of the Lord has already come. He says that the end cannot come until the appearance of “the man of lawlessness,” in accordance with the work of Satan. The “man of lawlessness” will exalt himself over all that is identified as divine or worshipped, set himself up in the Temple of God and even claim to be God. The secret of lawlessness is already at work, but the one who restrains it will continue to do so until it is removed. Then the lawless one will be revealed, whom Christ will destroy at his parousia.
In another departure from standard epistolary form, Paul offers another thanksgiving for and prayer on behalf of the Thessalonians.
Paul asks for prayer that the gospel will continue to spread and that Paul and his associates would be protected from evil men. He also exhorts the Thessalonians not to be idle nor associate with the idle, laying down the rule that if a man does not work, he ought not to eat.
This represents the conclusion
of the letter, including benedictions and greetings.
6. Why was the Second Letter to the Thessalonians written?
Assuming that he wrote what he did for a purpose, what can you determine about Paul's reasons for writing the Second Letter to the Thessalonians from the contents of following passages?
6.1. 2 Thess 1:3-12
In order to encourage them in their persecution, Paul explains to the Thessalonians that, because of their sufferings at the hands of their persecutors, they will be counted worthy of the Kingdom of God and that their persecutors will be punished when the Lord Jesus is revealed—since God is just.
6.2. 2 Thess 3:6-15
Paul writes to correct a tendency towards idleness among the Thessalonians, who are reminded that they were taught that "If anyone is not willing to work, he shall not eat." Since he sent 1 Thessalonians, this problem has arisen and he has become aware of it somehow.
6.3. 2 Thess 2:2
to correct a rumor that had been circulating that the second coming
has already come (2:2); there seems to have been a fraudulent letter
circulating in Paul's name.
in order to ask the Thessalonians for prayer because of the resistance
that he and his associates are experiencing to the preaching of the
gospel in Corinth (see Acts 18).